A feasible feat, in fact: update

Apropos today’s post about feat, it occurred to me to check the online version of the New York Times, where I found that the typo in this morning’s printed-in-Austin edition, “leapt to their feat,” has been fixed. (My spell-checker, by the way, insists on underlining leapt, even though it is one of the two feasible past tenses of leap; the other is the regularized leaped, which the spell-checker is happy with.)

Steve Schwartzman

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

If you encounter an unfamiliar technical term in any of these postings, check the Glossary in the bar across the top of the page.
©2011–2016 Steven Schwartzman
%d bloggers like this: